To Rant, Vent and Converse: Protecting Low Level Digital Speech
Jacob H. Rowbottom
University of Oxford - Faculty of Law
April 2, 2012
Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 71, No. 2, 2012
Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper No. 17/2012
Expression on the internet is now regulated by a wide range of UK laws, including public order laws, media laws and laws that were drafted to target poison pen letters and nuisance phone calls. While these laws were initially designed to regulate different spheres of activity, they now converge and can regulate the same types of digital expression. Digital speakers are now exposed to various legal controls. Recent cases have shown that conversations on social networks and in other forums can be the subject of criminal prosecution and libel actions. While the European free speech jurisprudence has traditionally focused on protecting speech on matters in the public interest, it is argued that these principles do not give sufficient protection to casual conversations and ‘everyday’ expression. This article considers alternative free speech arguments and looks at the case for more proportionate controls on digital expression.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 24
Keywords: Freedom of speech, digital communications, Article 10, communications act 2003Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: April 2, 2012
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.422 seconds