|
||||
|
||||
A Method for Improving Welfare Estimates from Multiple-Referendum SurveysGwanSeon KimUniversity of Georgia - Department of Agricultural & Applied Economics Daniel R. PetroliaMississippi State University - Department of Agricultural Economics Matthew G. InterisMississippi State University April 1, 2012 Journal of Agricultural & Resource Economics, Forthcoming Abstract: This paper introduces an alternative non-market value elicitation method, the “quasi-double-referendum (QDR),” applied to barrier island restoration in Mississippi. It is appropriate for surveys which elicit willingness-to-pay responses to multiple projects differing in scale only, and can be used to increase efficiency while mitigating bias. We compare results to the more commonly used single-referendum (SR) method under two admissible ranges of willingness to pay: negative to positive infinity, and zero to income. The confidence intervals of the QDR models were narrower. We argue that the QDR approach should be less subject to bias than the commonly used double-referendum approach.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 29 Keywords: quasi double-bound method, single-bound method, willingness to pay JEL Classification: C34, Q24 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: April 2, 2012Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.719 seconds