The Dubious Legal Rationale for Denying Copyright to Fashion

Samson Vermont

University of Miami - School of Law; Charlotte School of Law

November 27, 2012

This essay clarifies the useful article doctrine and argues that it does not, as clarified, bar copyright for fanciful clothing. Clarification is necessary because the drafters of the 1976 Act botched their attempt to codify the doctrine. As written, the Act denies copyright to a useful article unless its aesthetic features are separable from its utilitarian function. Separability, however, is irrelevant. What matters is whether the article has unconstrained features. The features of many fanciful garments are unconstrained enough for copyright. Indeed, they are more unconstrained than the features of other useful articles that courts already protect.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 17

Keywords: copyright, fashion, clothing, useful article, separability, functionality, IDPPPA, innovative design

JEL Classification: K11, O31, O34

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: April 3, 2012 ; Last revised: January 8, 2013

Suggested Citation

Vermont, Samson, The Dubious Legal Rationale for Denying Copyright to Fashion (November 27, 2012). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2033350 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2033350

Contact Information

Samson Vermont (Contact Author)
University of Miami - School of Law ( email )
Miami, FL
United States

Charlotte School of Law
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 857
Downloads: 101
Download Rank: 181,034
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.375 seconds