Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2033350
 


 



The Dubious Legal Rationale for Denying Copyright to Fashion


Samson Vermont


University of Miami - School of Law; Charlotte School of Law

November 27, 2012


Abstract:     
This essay clarifies the useful article doctrine and argues that it does not, as clarified, bar copyright for fanciful clothing. Clarification is necessary because the drafters of the 1976 Act botched their attempt to codify the doctrine. As written, the Act denies copyright to a useful article unless its aesthetic features are separable from its utilitarian function. Separability, however, is irrelevant. What matters is whether the article has unconstrained features. The features of many fanciful garments are unconstrained enough for copyright. Indeed, they are more unconstrained than the features of other useful articles that courts already protect.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 17

Keywords: copyright, fashion, clothing, useful article, separability, functionality, IDPPPA, innovative design

JEL Classification: K11, O31, O34

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: April 3, 2012 ; Last revised: January 8, 2013

Suggested Citation

Vermont, Samson, The Dubious Legal Rationale for Denying Copyright to Fashion (November 27, 2012). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2033350 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2033350

Contact Information

Samson Vermont (Contact Author)
University of Miami - School of Law ( email )
Miami, FL
United States

Charlotte School of Law
Charlotte
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 741
Downloads: 93
Download Rank: 171,047
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.390 seconds