Impact at the 'Bottom of the Pyramid': The Role of Social Capital in Capability Development and Community Empowerment
University of Cambridge - Judge Business School; Erasmus University, Rotterdam (EUR)
University of Cambridge - Judge Business School
affiliation not provided to SSRN
April 4, 2012
• Ansari, S., Munir, K., and Gregg, T. 2012. Bowling alone? Empowering communities at the ‘Bottom of the Pyramid’ through business driven ventures” Forthcoming in Journal of Management Studies, Special Issue on Organisational Innovation for Inclusive Growth. Volume 49, issue 4.
Rooted in the notion of inclusive capitalism, the Bottom-of-the-Pyramid (BoP) approach argues for the simultaneous pursuit of profit and social welfare by creating markets for the poor. This idea has both been celebrated and criticized in the literature. We do neither in this paper. Instead, by leveraging insights from Amartya Sen’s work on capability development and the literature on social capital, we offer a more socially embedded and community-centric BoP approach. By redefining poverty not just as a lack of income, but also a lack of “capabilities” in Sen’s sense that can be developed through leveraging social capital, we offer a systemic framework for understanding the societal impact of business-driven ventures in the BoP and empowering BoP communities through these ventures. Specifically, we argue that any business initiative in the BoP ought to be evaluated on the basis of whether it advances capability transfer and retention by a) enhancing the social capital between a particular community and other more resource rich networks and b) preserving the existing social capital in the community.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 56
Keywords: Bottom of the Pyramid, Corporate Social Responsibility, Social Entrepreneurship, Capitalism, Social Capital, Networks, Amartya Sen, Capabilities, Community wellbeing, Income, Poverty alleviation, Public-Private Collaboration
JEL Classification: M1, M14, D63Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: April 4, 2012 ; Last revised: May 7, 2012
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo1 in 1.375 seconds