Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2034435
 


 



What is Left of the Law and Society Paradigm after Critique? Revisiting Gordon’s 'Critical Legal Histories'


Christopher L. Tomlins


University of California, Irvine School of Law

2012

Law and Social Inquiry, Vol. 37, No. 1, p. 155, Winter 2012
UC Irvine School of Law Research Paper No. 2012-21

Abstract:     
For more than twenty-five years, Robert Gordon’s “Critical Legal Histories” has been savored by legal historians as one of the most incisive explanations available of what legal history can and should be. Gordon’s essay, however, is of significance to the course of sociolegal studies in general. This commentary offers an appreciation, and a critique, of “Critical Legal Histories.” It explores Gordon’s articulation of the central themes of critical legal studies, in particular his corrosion of functionalism and embrace of the indeterminacy thesis, and assesses the consequences for sociolegal and legal-historical analysis of the resultant stress on the contingency and complexity of social life.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 13

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: April 4, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Tomlins, Christopher L., What is Left of the Law and Society Paradigm after Critique? Revisiting Gordon’s 'Critical Legal Histories' (2012). Law and Social Inquiry, Vol. 37, No. 1, p. 155, Winter 2012; UC Irvine School of Law Research Paper No. 2012-21. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2034435

Contact Information

Christopher L. Tomlins (Contact Author)
University of California, Irvine School of Law ( email )
535A Administration
Irvine, CA 92697-1000
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 611
Downloads: 201
Download Rank: 86,461

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.250 seconds