|
||||
|
||||
Law and Discretion in the Contemporary Chinese CourtsMargaret WooNortheastern University - School of Law 1999 Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal, Vol. 8, No. 3 pp. 581-616, September 1999 Northeastern University School of Law Research Paper Abstract: This article examines the three types of judicial discretion that exists in any legal system – fact based discretion; self-interested discretion, and ideological discretion -- in the context of China. Through its procedural laws, the Chinese legal system demonstrated a continuing preference for informality and flexibility. While concept of supervision and the procedure of adjudication supervision are efforts to constrain fact-based and self-serving personal discretion, the concept of “supervision” is also a window to ensure ideological compliance in individual judicial work.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 35 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: April 5, 2012 ; Last revised: July 18, 2012Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo4 in 2.079 seconds