Mediating Multiculturally: Culture and the Ethical Mediator
Georgetown University Law Center; University of California Irvine, School of Law
MEDIATION ETHICS: CASES & COMMENTARIES, 305-338, Ellen Waldman, ed., San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2011
UC Irvine School of Law Research Paper No. 2012-28
Georgetown Public Law Research Paper No. 12-061
This commentary on mediating multiculturally in a chapter of Mediation Ethics (edited by Ellen Waldman) suggests there are times when mediators should not mediate, because of their own ethical commitments. Commenting on a hypothetical divorce scenario (of Ziba, a 17 year old from her 44 year old husband, with two children aged 3 and 2, where the parties claim to want Shari’a principles to apply), the author (Carrie Menkel-Meadow) suggests that she would not mediate a case which might violate formal laws (American marriage and divorce laws) or infringe on rights that one of the parties might not be fully aware of. A variety of sources of ethics, including formal law, legal and mediation ethical rules, and personal ethical commitments may structure how mediators choose whether to take a case, educate the parties about their rights, make a referral, or how to mediate if complex (and different for each of the parties and/or the mediator) legal, moral, religious and cultural values are at stake. The chapter contains contrasting views expressed by two different mediators, with summary and commentary by the book’s editor.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 35Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: April 5, 2012 ; Last revised: May 30, 2012
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo5 in 1.281 seconds