Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2035218
 
 

Footnotes (307)



 


 



The Limits of New Originalism


Joel Alicea


Harvard Law School

Donald L. Drakeman


University of Cambridge; Notre Dame Law School

April 6, 2012

University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law, Vol. 15

Abstract:     
We argue that New Originalism, which has emerged as the dominant theory of originalism, has a significant methodological limitation for anyone who takes historical research seriously. That limitation arises where historical sources indicate different possible original meanings, which can occur because of New Originalism’s focus on the meaning of the text for a hypothetical, reasonable person at the time of ratification. We describe the first instance of this problem, which occurred in Hylton v. United States (1796). Hylton involved the constitutionality of an excise tax, and we use that case to provide a real example of the impossibility of a New Originalist interpretation when the historical materials provide clear evidence of equally plausible but conflicting meanings. We suggest that Justice Paterson's opinion in Hylton offers a solution to this problem: where New Originalism cannot settle the question of original meaning, judges might turn to Old Originalism's focus on the intentions of the Founders. Our article thus makes three significant contributions to constitutional scholarship: (1) it identifies a critical weakness of New Originalism; (2) it demonstrates how the Supreme Court in the founding era used Old Originalism to resolve this problem; and (3) it represents the most complete analysis of the historical meaning of the taxation provisions in Hylton, which may prove to be useful for present or future litigation over the taxing power.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 71

Keywords: Originalism, New Originalism, Michael Stokes Paulsen, excise, taxation, Hylton

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: April 6, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Alicea, Joel and Drakeman, Donald L., The Limits of New Originalism (April 6, 2012). University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law, Vol. 15. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2035218

Contact Information

Joel Alicea
Harvard Law School ( email )
United States
Donald L. Drakeman (Contact Author)
University of Cambridge ( email )
Centre for Health Leadership
Trumpington Street
Cambridge, CB2 1AG
United Kingdom
Notre Dame Law School ( email )
P.O. Box 780
Notre Dame, IN 46556-0780
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,232
Downloads: 235
Download Rank: 74,246
Footnotes:  307

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.344 seconds