|
||||
|
||||
An Empirical Study of Option Prices for Hunting PermitsTo N. NguyenUniversity of Guelph W. Douglass ShawTexas A&M University Richard T. WoodwardTexas A&M University - Department of Agricultural Economics Robert W. PatersonIndustrial Economics, Inc. Kevin BoyleVirginia Polytechnic Institute & State University April 9, 2012 Ecological Economics, Vol. 63, 2007 Abstract: Using data from a 1992 survey of Maine hunters, we estimate the willingness to pay for a program that would eliminate the risk of non-participation in an otherwise lottery-rationed moose hunting system. We develop an empirical model to estimate the option price (OP) hunters have for eliminating this risk, based on survey data. We find an estimated OP to eliminate the non-participation risk associated with the lottery system of over $380. The estimated results are compared with the results of 12 years of management experience. We also provide a modest ex-post analysis and overview of an auction of a small number of licenses occurring since 1998. Based on the estimates from the model and survey data, we believe that moose management strategies in recent years would pass a benefit-cost test.
Keywords: Option price, Lottery-rationed hunting, Contingent Valuation JEL Classification: Q26 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: April 9, 2012Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.797 seconds