Meaningless Comparisons: Corporate Tax Reform Discourse in the United States

72 Pages Posted: 9 Apr 2012 Last revised: 2 Jan 2013

See all articles by Omri Y. Marian

Omri Y. Marian

University of California, Irvine School of Law

Date Written: April 2, 2012

Abstract

This article examines the role that international comparisons play in current corporate tax reform discourse in the United States. Citing the need to make the U.S. corporate tax system more competitive, comparisons are frequently used to assess other jurisdictions’ tax-competitiveness, and many legislative proposals are supported by such comparative arguments. Examining such discourse against the background of several theoretical approaches to comparative law, this article argues that to the extent that comparisons are aimed at providing guidance for prospective reform, this purpose is not well served. Participants in the corporate tax reform discourse, from both sides of the aisle, lack any comparative methodological discipline. They execute comparisons in an incoherent way, often ignoring important differences between the United States and the jurisdictions it is compared to. The result is proposals that are based on misperceptions of the way that corporate tax laws operate in the compared jurisdictions. The article further suggests that a coherent methodology, if explicitly harnessed to promote a well-defined agenda, could make international comparison a constructive instrument of tax-policy making.

Keywords: Comparative Taxation, Comparative Law, Legal Reform, International Taxation, Tax Reform Discourse

JEL Classification: K34, K33, H25

Suggested Citation

Marian, Omri Y., Meaningless Comparisons: Corporate Tax Reform Discourse in the United States (April 2, 2012). 32 Virginia Tax Review 133 (2012), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2037295

Omri Y. Marian (Contact Author)

University of California, Irvine School of Law ( email )

401 E. Peltason Dr.
Ste. 1000
Irvine, CA 92697-1000
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
287
Abstract Views
2,091
Rank
193,678
PlumX Metrics