Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2037378
 
 

Footnotes (113)



 


 



Law, Power, and 'Rumors of War': Robert Jackson Confronts Law and Security after Nuremberg


Mary L. Dudziak


Emory University School of Law; Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences

April 9, 2012

60 Buffalo Law Review 367 (2012)
USC Law Legal Studies Paper No. 12-7
Emory Legal Studies Research Paper No. 12-191

Abstract:     
Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson’s most important legacy was his role as chief prosecutor for the United States at the Nuremberg Trials. This essay follows Jackson’s legal thought from his return to the United States after Nuremberg, until his death in 1954. Jackson hoped that the lesson of Nuremberg would be “to establish the supremacy of law over such lawless and catastrophic forces as war and persecutions.” Jackson changed law that applied to warfare. In looking to the future, he seems to have assumed that although law had changed, war would retain its essential character. Yet as the post-war years became instead the Cold War years, Jackson found himself in an era when the boundaries around wartime were eroding. The world entered an ambiguous era that seemed to be neither war nor peace. As Jackson himself would put it in 1951, rather than a break between wartime and peacetime, there was instead “a prolonged period of international tension and rumors of war, with war itself as the ever threatening alternative.”

Jackson’s response to the Cold War era was twofold. In cases involving members of the Communist Party, he argued that they were different in kind from other dissenters, so that the Justice who argued that the rule of law should apply to Nazi leaders also argued for a departure from applicable first amendment analysis because of the dangers posed by communism. In the area of war-related powers, Jackson took up more directly the ambiguous character of an era that seemed neither wartime nor peacetime. In this context, he favored limits on presidential power. Calling the Korean War an undeclared “foreign venture,” he argued in his famous Steel Seizure concurrence that it would subvert constitutional limits for a president to go to war without a declaration from congress, and then use that state of war as the basis for expanding his own domestic authority.

The essay is based on my contribution to the 2011 James McCormick Mitchell Lecture program at SUNY Buffalo Law School, which commemorated Robert Jackson’s first public lecture after he returned from Nuremberg in 1946.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 20

Keywords: Robert Jackson, Nuremberg, war, security, Cold War, Korean War, Communist, Steel Seizure, war powers, undeclared war

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: April 10, 2012 ; Last revised: May 30, 2012

Suggested Citation

Dudziak, Mary L., Law, Power, and 'Rumors of War': Robert Jackson Confronts Law and Security after Nuremberg (April 9, 2012). 60 Buffalo Law Review 367 (2012); USC Law Legal Studies Paper No. 12-7; Emory Legal Studies Research Paper No. 12-191. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2037378

Contact Information

Mary L. Dudziak (Contact Author)
Emory University School of Law ( email )
1301 Clifton Road
Atlanta, GA 30322
United States
Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences ( email )
75 Alta Rd
Stanford, CA 94305
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 632
Downloads: 117
Download Rank: 142,263
Footnotes:  113

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.297 seconds