Bring in the Nerds: Secrecy, National Security and the Creation of International Intellectual Property Law
David S. Levine
Elon University School of Law; Center for Information Technology Policy at Princeton University; Stanford University - Center for Internet and Society
April 6, 2012
Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, Vol. 30, No. 2, p. 105, 2012
The negotiations of the international Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement and Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement have been conducted largely in secret, elevating intellectual property piracy to the level of national security concerns for purposes of accessing information through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). However, the level of actual secrecy has been tiered, with corporate interests enjoying far more access to negotiation information than the general public. At the same time, similar intellectual property issues were negotiated in the relative transparency of Congress’ debate over the Stop Online Piracy Act and PROTECT IP Act, allowing for much greater public involvement. With national security concerns as the backdrop, the focus of this Article is the use of national security arguments to prevent the public, and more specifically, public experts (i.e., the “nerds”) from accessing information through FOIA about the creation of international intellectual property law. The Article proposes ways to address the information failures existing in international intellectual property lawmaking and international lawmaking more generally from policy and, as introduced in this Article, theoretical perspectives.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 47
Keywords: SOPA, PIPA, ACTA, TPP, national security, FOIA, freedom of information, copyright, international law, sunshine
Date posted: April 10, 2012 ; Last revised: May 25, 2012
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.203 seconds