Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2038063
 
 

Footnotes (243)



 


 



Children, Chimps, and Rights Arguments from 'Marginal' Cases


Richard L. Cupp Jr.


Pepperdine University School of Law

2012

45 Ariz. St. L.J. 1 (2013)
Pepperdine University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2012/12

Abstract:     
Are animals the new children regarding legal personhood and rights? Animal law is likely the fastest-growing course offering in United States law schools over the past decade. The core question in this subject is how close law should come to treating animals like humans, with the penultimate issue being whether animals should be granted legal personhood status and some legal rights. Most writers addressing this issue, including prominent scholars such as Cass Sunstein, Lawrence Tribe, Martha Nussbaum and Alan Dershowitz, have supported extending a legal rights paradigm to at least some animals. A thesis that is often called the “argument from marginal cases” is central to many supporters of animal rights. The argument from marginal cases holds that if rights are granted to humans with limited capacity for autonomy, such as young children, they must also be granted to intelligent animals (such as chimpanzees) possessing equal or greater autonomy. This article rejects the argument from marginal cases, with particular emphasis on efforts to apply the argument to children. Focusing on children’s potential for moral autonomy and the relationship between that potential and the social contract, the problem of overstating similarities between human and animal cognition, and the interconnectedness of humanity and legal rights, the article concludes that courts and legislatures should decline using children’s rights as a basis for applying legal rights to animals. Rather than creating new rights for animals, society and its laws should place greater focus on humans’ moral responsibility for our treatment of animals.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 53

Keywords: animal, children, personhood, rights, human, legal rights paradigm, non-human, capacity, autonomy, intelligent, social contract, cognition, humanity, society, moral, treatment, slippery slope, adult

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: April 10, 2012 ; Last revised: March 16, 2013

Suggested Citation

Cupp, Richard L., Children, Chimps, and Rights Arguments from 'Marginal' Cases (2012). 45 Ariz. St. L.J. 1 (2013); Pepperdine University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2012/12. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2038063

Contact Information

R.L. Cupp Jr. (Contact Author)
Pepperdine University School of Law ( email )
24255 Pacific Coast Highway
Malibu, CA 90263
United States
(310) 506-4658 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 596
Downloads: 135
Download Rank: 120,587
Footnotes:  243
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.250 seconds