Brief of Amici Curiae, In re David Marshall Brown, Case No. 12-cv-60016-KAM, United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
Nancy B. Rapoport
University of Nevada, Las Vegas, William S. Boyd School of Law
Law Offices of George Castrataro, PA
April 11, 2012
Amicus Brief, Case 0:12-cv-60016-KAM, Document 17-1, Entered on FLSD Docket 04/11/2012
UNLV William S. Boyd School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series
This amicus brief argues that, when the only objection to a proof of claim in an individual debtor's bankruptcy case is that some paperwork is missing, but not that the amount is incorrect, filing an objection that moves to strike the entire claim is a violation of Bankruptcy Rule 9011 and sanctions should be upheld.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 18
Keywords: Bankruptcy Code, Rule 9011, attorneys, professional responsibility, ethics, debtors, individual debtors
JEL Classification: K1, K19, K29, K39, K42, K49Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: July 31, 2012
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.969 seconds