|
|
|
|
||||
|
||||
Brief of Amici Curiae, In re David Marshall Brown, Case No. 12-cv-60016-KAM, United States District Court, Southern District of FloridaNancy B. RapoportUniversity of Nevada, Las Vegas, William S. Boyd School of Law George CastrataroLaw Offices of George Castrataro, PA April 11, 2012 Amicus Brief, Case 0:12-cv-60016-KAM, Document 17-1, Entered on FLSD Docket 04/11/2012 UNLV William S. Boyd School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series Abstract: This amicus brief argues that, when the only objection to a proof of claim in an individual debtor's bankruptcy case is that some paperwork is missing, but not that the amount is incorrect, filing an objection that moves to strike the entire claim is a violation of Bankruptcy Rule 9011 and sanctions should be upheld.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 18 Keywords: Bankruptcy Code, Rule 9011, attorneys, professional responsibility, ethics, debtors, individual debtors JEL Classification: K1, K19, K29, K39, K42, K49 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: July 31, 2012Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.312 seconds
