Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2038626
 


 



Changing Voices in a Familiar Conversation about Rules vs. Standards: Veterans Law at the Federal Circuit in 2011


James D. Ridgway


The George Washington University Law School

2012

American University Law Review, Vol. 61, No. 1175, 2012

Abstract:     
This review of the Federal Circuit's veterans benefits case law in 2011 suggests that a familiar struggle between rules and standards lurks under the surface of some of the more familiar debates in veterans law. In particular, it suggests that the struggle between Chevron deference and Gardner’s rule of resolving ambiguity in favor of the veteran can be framed this way. It also suggests that the rules-versus-standards framing can be used to better understand the debate about what it means for the benefits system to be veteran friendly. In addition, this article addresses the changing dynamics surrounding veterans law and reviews important statistics describing the Federal Circuit’s veterans law decisions in 2011.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 55

Keywords: veterans law, federal circuit, rules, standards, chevron, gardner

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: April 12, 2012 ; Last revised: April 15, 2012

Suggested Citation

Ridgway, James D., Changing Voices in a Familiar Conversation about Rules vs. Standards: Veterans Law at the Federal Circuit in 2011 (2012). American University Law Review, Vol. 61, No. 1175, 2012. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2038626

Contact Information

James D. Ridgway (Contact Author)
The George Washington University Law School ( email )
2000 H Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20052
United States
HOME PAGE: http://www.law.gwu.edu/Faculty/profile.aspx?id=19582

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 270
Downloads: 75
Download Rank: 195,300

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.312 seconds