Up in Smoke: The Influence of Household Behavior on the Long-Run Impact of Improved Cooking Stoves
72 Pages Posted: 16 Apr 2012 Last revised: 1 May 2012
There are 2 versions of this paper
Up in Smoke: The Influence of Household Behavior on the Long-Run Impact of Improved Cooking Stoves
Up in Smoke: the Influence of Household Behavior on the Long-Run Impact of Improved Cooking Stoves
Date Written: April 16, 2012
Abstract
It is conventional wisdom that it is possible to reduce exposure to indoor air pollution, improve health outcomes, and decrease greenhouse gas emissions in rural areas of developing countries through the adoption of improved cooking stoves. This is largely supported by observational field studies and engineering or laboratory experiments. However, we provide new evidence, from a randomized control trial conducted in rural Orissa, India (one of the poorest places in India) on the benefits of a commonly used improved stove that laboratory tests showed to reduce indoor air pollution and require less fuel. We track households for up to four years after they received the stove. While we find a meaningful reduction in smoke inhalation in the first year, there is no effect over longer time horizons. We find no evidence of improvements in lung functioning or health and there is no change in fuel consumption (and presumably greenhouse gas emissions). The difference between the laboratory and field findings appears to result from households’ revealed low valuation of the stoves. Households failed to use the stoves regularly or appropriately, did not make the necessary investments to maintain them properly, and usage rates ultimately declined further over time. More broadly, this study underscores the need to test environmental and health technologies in real-world settings where behavior may temper impacts, and to test them over a long enough horizon to understand how this behavioral effect evolves over time.
Keywords: indoor air pollution, human health, climate change, technology adoption
JEL Classification: O10, O13, O12, Q0, Q23, Q3, Q51, Q53, Q56, I15, I18
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Air Quality, Infant Mortality, and the Clean Air Act of 1970
-
Air Quality, Infant Mortality, and the Clean Air Act of 1970
-
Air Pollution and Infant Health: What Can We Learn from California's Recent Experience
By Janet Currie and Matthew Neidell
-
Air Pollution and Infant Health: What Can We Learn from California's Recent Experience?
By Janet Currie and Matthew Neidell
-
An Assessment of the Benefits of Air Pollution Control: the Case of Infant Health
By Theodore Joyce, Michael Grossman, ...
-
Air Quality and Early-Life Mortality: Evidence from Indonesia's Wildfires
-
Air Pollution and Infant Health: Lessons from New Jersey
By Janet Currie, Matthew Neidell, ...
-
Traffic Congestion and Infant Health: Evidence from E-Zpass
By Janet Currie and Reed Walker
-
Information, Avoidance Behavior, and Health: the Effect of Ozone on Asthma Hospitalizations