The Concept of Injustice
Queen Mary University of London, School of Law
April 13, 2012
Queen Mary School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 114/2012
This book presents a challenge to traditional Western justice theory. Thinkers from Plato and Aristotle through to Kant, Hegel, Marx and Rawls have subordinated the idea of injustice to the idea of justice. Misled by the word’s etymology, political theorists have assumed injustice to be the sheer, logical opposite of justice. Heinze summons ancient and early modern texts, philosophical and literary, to argue that injustice is not primarily the negation, failure or absence of justice. It is the constant product of regimes and norms of justice. Justice is not always the cure for injustice, and is often its cause. The core elements of traditional justice theories are unity and measurement. No justice theory is conceivable without one or both of them. Measurement, in particular, has dominated Western modernity. However, it is those two elements which constantly produce injustice — not as the opposite of justice, but as its necessary result. The relationship between injustice and injustice is more complex than one of mutual exclusion. In this book, literary classics offer evidence of that complex relationship, from Sophocles to Milton, including discussions of Shakespeare’s The Merchant of Venice and Timon of Athens, and Corneille’s Le Cid.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 21
Keywords: Ethical Philosophy, Jurisprudence, Justice Theory, Law & Humanities, Law & Literature, Law & Shakespeare, Legal Theory, Legal Philosophy, Political PhilosophyAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: April 14, 2012
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.469 seconds