Vagueness and Power-Delegation in Law: A Reply to Sorensen
University of Iceland, Institute of Philosophy
April 15, 2012
M. Freeman & F. Smith (Eds.), Current Legal Issues: Law and Language (Oxford University Press) 2012
Roy Sorensen has argued that vagueness in the law cannot be justified by appeal to the value of power-delegation, and thereby threatens to take away one of the main reasons for thinking that vagueness can be valuable to law. Delegation of power to officials is justified, he thinks, only if these officials are in a better position to discover whether a particular x is F, a condition not satisfied in cases of vagueness. I argue that Sorensen’s argument is unsound: delegation of power can be valuable even if the delegates are not in a better position to answer that question.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 18
Keywords: Philosophy, Law, Language, Vagueness, Legislation, Delegation of PowerAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: April 15, 2012 ; Last revised: November 23, 2012
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.344 seconds