Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2040775
 
 

Footnotes (47)



 


 



Restoring Restitution to the Canon


Douglas Laycock


University of Virginia School of Law

April 16, 2012

Michigan Law Review, Vol. 110, No. 6, p. 929, 2012
Virginia Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 2012-26

Abstract:     
This is a review of the Restatement (Third) of Restitution and Unjust Enrichment. This new Restatement makes an important body of law much more accessible to lawyers, judges, and scholars. It offers functional explanations in modern English, with minimal reliance on distinctions between law and equity and with no explanations that depend on quasi-contract or the forms of action. It should be on every litigator’s bookshelf, and anyone who works in private law should at least be familiar with it. Restitution has broad applications to mistake, failed contracts, commercial torts, intellectual property, insolvency, remedies, and many narrower topics.

This review surveys the Restatement’s scope of coverage, organization, and basic substantive principles. I devote special attention to the Restatement’s clarification of the relationship between restitution and contract, and thus of contract remedies more generally. And I consider its treatment of attorneys’ fees in common fund cases as a means of examining its strong presumption against forced exchanges — against requiring defendants to pay for benefits they might not have wanted.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 25

Keywords: restitution, unjust enrichment, restatement, disgorgement, mistake, voluntary payment rule, contract damages, forced exchange, attorneys' fees, common fund cases

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: April 16, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Laycock, Douglas, Restoring Restitution to the Canon (April 16, 2012). Michigan Law Review, Vol. 110, No. 6, p. 929, 2012; Virginia Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 2012-26. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2040775

Contact Information

Douglas Laycock (Contact Author)
University of Virginia School of Law ( email )
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 394
Downloads: 94
Download Rank: 164,223
Footnotes:  47

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.266 seconds