Abstract

 
 

References (14)



 


 



Relative Consumption Concerns or Non-Monotonic Preferences?


Inga Hillesheim


University of Tuebingen

Mario Mechtel


University of Trier - Institute of Labour Law and Industrial Relations in the European Community; University of Tuebingen

April 17, 2012


Abstract:     
We conduct a classroom survey to investigate the willingness to sacrifice consumption in absolute terms in order to ascend above others in terms of consumption levels. In contrast to other studies using survey methodologies, participants are divided into a treatment and a control group. This allows us to distinguish whether choosing less in absolute terms is really induced by relative consumption concerns, or else by non-monotonic preferences. We find that relative consumption concerns provide a good explanation for choosing less in the case of some goods, while this is not the case for a number of other goods.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 20

Keywords: status consumption, social status, behavioral economics, other-regarding preferences

JEL Classification: C91, D63, D10

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: April 18, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Hillesheim, Inga Gabriele and Mechtel, Mario, Relative Consumption Concerns or Non-Monotonic Preferences? (April 17, 2012). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2041113 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2041113

Contact Information

Inga Gabriele Hillesheim
University of Tuebingen ( email )
Melanchthonstraße 34
72074 Tuebingen, Baden Wuerttemberg 72074
Germany
++4970712972986 (Phone)
++497071295590 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://www.fiwi.uni-tuebingen.de
Mario Mechtel (Contact Author)
University of Trier - Institute of Labour Law and Industrial Relations in the European Community ( email )
Campus II - Gebäude H
Trier, 54286
Germany
+496512014757 (Phone)
University of Tuebingen ( email )
Melanchthonstraße 30
72074 Tuebingen, Baden Wuerttemberg 72074
Germany
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 164
Downloads: 17
References:  14

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.390 seconds