Religious Symbols in the Public School Classroom
Erasmus University Rotterdam (EUR) - Erasmus School of Law & Editor-in-Chief of Religion & Human Rights: An International Journal
April 17, 2012
The Lautsi Papers: Multidisciplinary Reflections on Religious Symbols in the Public School Classroom (Leiden/Boston: BRILL/Martinus Nijhoff, 2012)
This paper flags a couple of preliminary legal questions that are remarkably often ignored or trivialized by (international) courts. Underscoring the importance of identifying primary rights holders, genuine conflicting interests, and the obligations of duty bearers in symbol cases, this contribution illustrates that much depends on who can be identified as ‘symbol-displayer’ and who as ‘symbol-viewer’ and within which particular (public) setting. Focusing on public school education, the paper addresses such questions as under what circumstances may State neutrality be considered a legitimate ground for limiting fundamental rights. And who is actually supposed ‘to be neutral’ according to human rights law –– States, buildings, the ‘public square’, civil servants, teachers, students, and/or pupils? When does a symbol truly ‘interfere’ with the rights and freedoms of others or with public order? And who is to prove that? Also, what are the exact standards of proof in symbols cases?
Number of Pages in PDF File: 36
Keywords: Lautsi, Lautsi v. Italy, religious symbols, public schools, symbols, religion, crucifix, headscarf, European Court of Human Rights, crucifixes, headscarves
Date posted: April 18, 2012
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.234 seconds