|
||||
|
||||
Jamming the Law: Improvisational Theatre and the ‘Spontaneity’ of JudgmentSara RamshawQueen's University Belfast April 17, 2012 (2010) 14:1 Law Text Culture 133, Special Issue on Law’s Theatrical Presence: frame, rhetoric, image, body, appearance Abstract: Modern ‘nonscripted’ theatre (NST) clearly owes much to improvisation. Perhaps less obviously, and more surprisingly, so too does modern law. In this article I will contend that, despite all the rules of evidence and procedure, statutes and legal precedents that fundamentally govern the decisions and actions of a judge, it is only through ‘spontaneity’ that judgment can take place. This claim may appear strange to those well-versed in the common law tradition which proceeds on the basis of past legal decisions, or reason where no precedent exists. NST, on the other hand, is assumed to rely heavily on the unprecedented and unreasoned. Therefore, when the public watches a NST production, it places its faith in the belief that what is being observed is entirely new and is being produced ‘on the spur of the moment’.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 29 Keywords: law, spontaneity, improvisation, theatre, jamming Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: April 18, 2012 ; Last revised: June 26, 2012Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.312 seconds