Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (34)



 


 



Foreword, the Constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act: Ideas from the Academy


Neil Siegel


Duke University - School of Law

April 3, 2012

Law and Contemporary Problems, Forthcoming

Abstract:     
The articles published in this volume of Law and Contemporary Problems address the constitutionality of the minimum coverage provision in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), either directly or indirectly. They were originally presented at a conference at Duke Law School on September 16, 2011. Entitled “The Constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act: Ideas from the Academy,” the conference was inspired by the belief that legal academics who specialize in U.S. constitutional law, health law and policy, or statutory interpretation are making distinctive contributions to the national debate over the constitutionality of the ACA. These legal academics are less constrained by their clients or their offices than are other legal actors, they are blessed with the time to study constitutional doctrine or health law for a living, and they often possess interdisciplinary expertise that is pertinent to the proper resolution of legal problems.

To be sure, these characteristics can be vices when exhibited in the practice of constitutional adjudication — particularly if creative impulses and theoretical ambitions are undisciplined by the necessity of deciding particular cases soundly. But these attributes can be virtues as well. Among many other activities, legal academics conduct original historical research, perceive connections among constitutional doctrines or provisions that have previously gone unnoticed, use relevant methods or insights of other disciplines to shed light on legal problems, and bring to bear their specialized legal knowledge to help courts of general jurisdiction decide between the clientcentered arguments of generalist appellate lawyers. These contributions can be relevant to the outcome of constitutional and statutory cases. This may help to explain why the Justices routinely cite the work of legal academics. Both the data and casual empiricism attest to the real-world relevance of much legal academic writing.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 6

Keywords: Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, ACA, health care, individual mandate, Commerce Clause, tax power, Necessary and Proper clause

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: April 18, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Siegel, Neil, Foreword, the Constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act: Ideas from the Academy (April 3, 2012). Law and Contemporary Problems, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2041458

Contact Information

Neil Siegel (Contact Author)
Duke University - School of Law ( email )
Box 90360
Duke School of Law
Durham, NC 27708
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 194
Downloads: 46
Footnotes:  34

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.375 seconds