Understanding 'The Loop': Regulating the Next Generation of War Machines
Harvard Law School
Harvard Law School
May 1, 2012
Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, Vol. 36, No. 3, 2013
The United States is in the midst of a national debate about the role drone aircraft should play in warfare abroad and law enforcement at home. But contemporary drones are merely the “Model T” of robot technology. Today, humans are still very much “in the loop”: humans decide when to launch a drone, where it should fly, and whether it should take action against a suspect. But as drones develop greater autonomy, humans will increasingly be out of the loop. Human operators will not be necessary to decide when a drone (or perhaps a swarm of microscopic drones) takes off, where it goes, how it acts, what it looks for, and when it strikes. In the language of engineers, tomorrow’s drones are expected to leap from “automation” to true “autonomy.”
Regulations for today’s drones must be crafted with an eye towards tomorrow’s technologies. Yet today’s debates about humans and “the loop” rely on language too imprecise to successfully analyze the relevant differences between drones and predecessor technologies. Confusion pervades discussions about when an advanced technological system is autonomous and what the implications of autonomy might be.
We argue that language useful to the policymaking process has already been developed in the same places as drones themselves — research and engineering laboratories around the country and abroad. We introduce this vocabulary here to explain how tomorrow’s drones will differ from today’s, outline the issues apt to follow, and suggest possible approaches to regulation. This paper equips policymakers to develop thoughtful rules built on a basic understanding of how drones actually work. This understanding is critical. As drone expert Peter Singer notes, the machines’ “intelligence and autonomy is growing. . . . The law’s not ready for all this.”
Autonomy is no longer solely a feature of humans. Whether it is a desirable quality for machines to have will be one of the most important public policy debates of the next generation.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 62
Keywords: OODA, machines, decision-making, drones, UAV, UAS, autonomy, automation, aerial, nanodrones, robots, war, war machines, ethics, robot ethics, philosophy, morality, Predator, Reaper, Global Hawk, military, LOAC, Law of Armed Conflict, discrimination, proportionality, necessity, humanity
JEL Classification: C80, D7, D70, D8, D80, D81, K33, N40, O33, O38, O39
Date posted: April 20, 2012 ; Last revised: October 4, 2012
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.250 seconds