Forms of Deference in Prison Law

Sharon Dolovich

University of California, Los Angeles - School of Law

April 20, 2012

Federal Sentencing Reporter, Vol. 24, No. 4, p. 245, April 2012
UCLA School of Law Research Paper No. 12-10

The imperative of judicial deference is arguably the primary driver of the Supreme Court’s prisoners’ rights jurisprudence. Yet taken as a body, the cases in this area reveal no principled basis for determining when deference is justified, what forms it may legitimately take, or the proper limits on its use. Instead, the mere mention of “deference” has emerged as a catch-all justification for curtailing both the burden on prison officials to ensure constitutional prisons and prisoners’ prospects for recovery even for arguably meritorious claims. The role of deference in prison law merits a longer and more in-depth treatment than I am able to offer here. This essay is simply a first cut at the issue. As such, it does three things. First, it identifies three main forms that deference takes in this area and provides examples of the deployment of each in the prisoners’ rights cases. Second, it highlights moments in the PLRA cases where the Court has opted not to defer (thus seeming to reject strategies it freely employs elsewhere), and offers a preliminary hypothesis as to why this might be. Third and finally, it calls for a theory of deference for the prison law context, i.e., for the development of principles to guide judicial deference in prison law cases and to set appropriate limits on its use.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 15

Keywords: prison law, prisoners’ rights, PLRA, Turner, Plata, judicial deference, judicial review, constitutional law, constitutional enforcement

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: April 22, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Dolovich, Sharon, Forms of Deference in Prison Law (April 20, 2012). Federal Sentencing Reporter, Vol. 24, No. 4, p. 245, April 2012; UCLA School of Law Research Paper No. 12-10. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2043225

Contact Information

Sharon Dolovich (Contact Author)
University of California, Los Angeles - School of Law ( email )
385 Charles E. Young Dr. East
Room 1242
Los Angeles, CA 90095-1476
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,084
Downloads: 168
Download Rank: 132,386
People who downloaded this paper also downloaded:
1. Cruelty, Prison Conditions, and the Eighth Amendment
By Sharon Dolovich

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.203 seconds