Abstract

 


 



A Thousand Tiny Pieces: The Federal Circuit’s Fractured Myriad Ruling, Lessons to Be Learned, and the Way Forward


Jonathan R.K. Stroud


American University Washington College of Law

September 20, 2011

IP Theory, Vol. 3, 2012
American University, WCL Research Paper

Abstract:     
The Supreme Court granted, vacated, and remanded the infamous Ass’n of Molecular Pathology v. U.S. Patent & Trademark Office (Myriad I), gene-isolation patentability case to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) in light of the recent Prometheus decision, which held 9-0 that a certain diagnostic method was invalid subject matter because it was an abstract idea merely modified by other obvious steps. This Article argues that Myriad should be affirmed again by the Federal Circuit, particularly in light of Prometheus, in order to inject certainty, clarity, and consistency into the § 101 patentable subject matter jurisprudence.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 24

Keywords: Myriad, Genetics, Diagnostics, Patents, Subject-Matter, 101, Prometheus, GVR, FDA, Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Federal Circuit, AMP v. USPTO

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: April 22, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Stroud, Jonathan R.K., A Thousand Tiny Pieces: The Federal Circuit’s Fractured Myriad Ruling, Lessons to Be Learned, and the Way Forward (September 20, 2011). IP Theory, Vol. 3, 2012; American University, WCL Research Paper. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2043263

Contact Information

Jonathan R.K. Stroud (Contact Author)
American University Washington College of Law ( email )
4801 Massachusetts Avenue N.W.
Washington, DC 20016
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 476
Downloads: 41

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.328 seconds