Abstract

 


 



Summary of G. Van Harten, 'The Use of Quantitative Methods to Examine Possible Bias in Investment Arbitration' and 'Reply' [to Franck, Garbin, and Perkins] in the Yearbook on International Investment Law & Policy (2011)


Gus Van Harten


York University - Osgoode Hall Law School

2011


Abstract:     
This is a summary of two articles I produced in an extended exchange with Susan D. Franck and others in the Yearbook on International Investment Law & Policy. The exchange dealt with the role of empirical methods in testing for possible bias in investment treaty arbitration and with various criticisms of Franck's earlier study on this topic in the Harvard International Law Journal (2009).

Number of Pages in PDF File: 2

Keywords: empirical methods, investment, arbitration, adjudication, bias

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: April 22, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Van Harten, Gus, Summary of G. Van Harten, 'The Use of Quantitative Methods to Examine Possible Bias in Investment Arbitration' and 'Reply' [to Franck, Garbin, and Perkins] in the Yearbook on International Investment Law & Policy (2011) (2011). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2043299 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2043299

Contact Information

Gus Van Harten (Contact Author)
York University - Osgoode Hall Law School ( email )
4700 Keele Street
Toronto, Ontario M3J 1P3
Canada
416 650 8419 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 305
Downloads: 89
Download Rank: 146,053

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.344 seconds