Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2043300
 
 

Footnotes (159)



 


 



Expanding the Bob Jones Compromise


Caroline Mala Corbin


University of Miami School of Law

April 20, 2012

ACCOMMODATION AND ITS LIMITS: LEGAL RESPONSES TO RELIGIOUS PRACTICES IN THE UNITED STATES, Austin Sarat, ed., Cambridge University Press, 2012

Abstract:     
Sometimes the right to liberty and the right to equality point in the same direction. Sometimes the two rights conflict. Which constitutional value should prevail when the right to religious liberty clashes with the right to be free from discrimination on the basis of race and sex? More particularly, should faith-based organizations, in the name of religious liberty, be immune from anti-discrimination law?

Bob Jones University v. United States suggests a compromise: permit faith-based organizations to discriminate on the basis of race or sex if that discrimination is religiously required, but at the same time refuse to condone or support that discrimination by denying those religious organizations any financial aid. In fact, it is already federal policy to withhold government subsidies from religious organizations that discriminate on the basis of race, and the Bob Jones Court rejected a free exercise challenge to that policy. The same policy should apply with regard to discrimination on the basis of sex. Allowing religious groups to discriminate on the basis of sex but declining to provide grants, vouchers, or tax exempt status to those that do discriminate honors both our commitment to religious liberty and our commitment to equality.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 23

Keywords: tax exemption, tax deduction, church autonomy, sex, race, discrimination, employment discrimination, religion, free exercise, establishment, religious liberty, equality, government funding, feminism

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: April 22, 2012 ; Last revised: December 14, 2012

Suggested Citation

Corbin, Caroline Mala, Expanding the Bob Jones Compromise (April 20, 2012). ACCOMMODATION AND ITS LIMITS: LEGAL RESPONSES TO RELIGIOUS PRACTICES IN THE UNITED STATES, Austin Sarat, ed., Cambridge University Press, 2012. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2043300

Contact Information

Caroline Mala Corbin (Contact Author)
University of Miami School of Law ( email )
1311 Miller Drive
Coral Gables, FL 33146
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,363
Downloads: 160
Download Rank: 103,854
Footnotes:  159
People who downloaded this paper also downloaded:
1. The Contraception Mandate
By Caroline Corbin

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.516 seconds