Abstract

 


 



An Analysis of the Supreme Court’s Reliance on Racial 'Stigma' as a Constitutional Concept in Affirmative Action Cases


Stephen R. McAllister


University of Kansas - School of Law

Andrew F. Halaby


affiliation not provided to SSRN

April 22, 1997

Michigan Journal of Race & Law, Vol. 2, No. 235, 1997

Abstract:     
This article addresses one of the asserted costs of affirmative action: stigmatization. The article offers structure to the debate over the definition and constitutional significance of the concept of “stigmatization” in the affirmative action context. In addition, the article sets forth a model for analyzing “stigma” as a constitutional concern, identifies particular strains of stigma on which the Supreme Court has relied, and analyzes the Supreme Court’s use of the concept in affirmative action cases.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 48

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: April 25, 2012  

Suggested Citation

McAllister, Stephen R. and Halaby, Andrew F., An Analysis of the Supreme Court’s Reliance on Racial 'Stigma' as a Constitutional Concept in Affirmative Action Cases (April 22, 1997). Michigan Journal of Race & Law, Vol. 2, No. 235, 1997. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2044052

Contact Information

Stephen R. McAllister (Contact Author)
University of Kansas - School of Law ( email )
Green Hall
1535 W. 15th Street
Lawrence, KS 66045-7577
United States
Andrew F. Halaby
affiliation not provided to SSRN
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 94
Downloads: 8

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.391 seconds