Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2044842
 
 

Footnotes (94)



 


 



Padilla v. Kentucky: Sound and Fury, or Transformative Impact


Steven Zeidman


CUNY School of Law

2011

Fordham Urban Law Journal, Vol. 39, No. 203, 2011

Abstract:     
The Supreme Court’s holding in Padilla v. Kentucky, that defense attorneys must provide their clients with adequate immigration advice concerning the potential impact of a guilty plea, was hailed by many commentators and advocates as a decision that would transform the landscape of criminal justice and the rights of the accused. Now, two years later, this Article explores whether Padilla in practice matches the lofty rhetoric it inspired.

First, the Article examines the underlying causes of the ineffective assistance of counsel addressed by the Court in Padilla, and distinguishes between individual attorney and structural culpability. The Article questions whether Padilla will change the behavior of individual attorneys who had been violating what the Court found to be longstanding and clear prescriptions requiring defense counsel to provide adequate immigration impact advice, and also suggests that Padilla will have little actual impact unless well-documented resource and systemic deficiencies in Public Defender offices are addressed.

The Article concludes by examining ways to measure Padilla’s impact and argues that Padilla should result in fewer guilty pleas, especially at the accused’s initial court appearance. Viewed through this lens, Padilla could end the practice known widely as 'meet, greet and plead,' as an attorney could not possibly fulfill Padilla’s mandate after just having met her client and not yet fully knowing her client’s immigration status or the legal impact of a guilty plea on that person’s particular situation. The Article concludes that the potential for Padilla to have a truly transformative impact is in its impact on client counseling – what defense attorneys say to their clients, and how and when they say it.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 25

Keywords: Supreme Court, immigration, court ruling, defense, public defender, Padilla, collateral consequences,

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: April 29, 2012 ; Last revised: January 10, 2014

Suggested Citation

Zeidman, Steven, Padilla v. Kentucky: Sound and Fury, or Transformative Impact (2011). Fordham Urban Law Journal, Vol. 39, No. 203, 2011. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2044842

Contact Information

Steven Zeidman (Contact Author)
CUNY School of Law ( email )
2 Court Square
Long Island City, NY
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 372
Downloads: 45
Footnotes:  94

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.328 seconds