Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2045034
 
 

Footnotes (207)



 


 



Sectorization & L3C Regulatory Arbitrage of Joint Ventures with Nonprofits


Carter G. Bishop


Suffolk University Law School

April 23, 2012

Suffolk University Law School Research Paper No. 12-19

Abstract:     
The raison d’etre for the nascent low-profit limited liability company (L3C) is to stimulate collaboration (“sectorization”) among government, private and charitable sectors in order to redirect for-profit capital models into the nonprofit sector. The hope is that the L3C will not only generate additional resources for charitable purposes, but also fundamentally transform business culture by signaling a more efficient way to “do good while doing well.” The L3C has been criticized for targeting only private foundation program related investments, a capital pipeline already exhausted by existing profit entity models. When compared to the existing nonprofit joint venture, the L3C emerges as a less efficient arbitrage model for stimulating profit sector investment in charitable enterprises. A comparative analysis yields instructive lessons regarding deficiencies in federal tax regulation of program related investments and joint ventures. In both cases, the federal tax rules utilize a differing “control test” to assure the exempt entity directs assets toward its charitable mission and away from private benefit to profit sector participants. This Article provides the first comprehensive comparative theory that the existing nonprofit-profit joint venture model is a more efficient solution to assuring compliance with the charitable mission when blending market returns to market capital investors. This theoretical framework exposes why L3C statutory operating procedures unnecessarily cripple profit efforts, undermine its effectiveness, and present policy dilemmas less prevalent in joint ventures where the nonprofit must exercise control over the business entity rather than simply an investment in the entity. As a result, program related investments should be scaled back and limited to determining only whether an investment jeopardizes a foundation’s exempt mission where the scale of the investment has a self-limiting role.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 65

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: April 23, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Bishop, Carter G., Sectorization & L3C Regulatory Arbitrage of Joint Ventures with Nonprofits (April 23, 2012). Suffolk University Law School Research Paper No. 12-19. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2045034 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2045034

Contact Information

Carter G. Bishop (Contact Author)
Suffolk University Law School ( email )
120 Tremont Street
Boston, MA 02108-4977
United States
617-573-8534 (Phone)

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 597
Downloads: 115
Download Rank: 141,877
Footnotes:  207
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.235 seconds