Religion and Race: On Duality and Entrenchment

Joy Milligan

Warren Institute on Law & Social Policy, UC Berkeley School of Law

May 12, 2012

New York University Law Review, Vol. 87, No. 2, May 2012

Can religion or race ever be the basis for legitimate government policies? For several decades, constitutional law concerning both religion and race has moved toward a model of formal neutrality. At its most expansive, the formal neutrality model bars all religion- or race-based decisions by government.

Recently, though, the Court has rejected an absolutist version of neutrality in the religion context. While maintaining that the First Amendment’s religion clauses themselves require only impartiality, the Court has allowed governments space to pursue substantive, constitutionally grounded concerns about religion, even if the resulting policies favor or disfavor individuals based upon their religion. The Court calls this space the “play in the joints” of the religion clauses: It allows governments to pursue separation of church and state or affirmatively protect religious exercise. But in the equal protection context, the Court has not shown such flexibility toward race-based action that is inspired by constitutional concerns, whether the policies are aimed at racial integration or substantive racial equality.

In this Article, I argue that the religion clauses and the Equal Protection Clause serve similar dual goals: protecting minorities from substantive harms and preventing majorities from entrenching their own power via the state. Formal neutrality prevents governments from addressing these constitutionally based concerns. The Court apparently grasps this difficulty in the religion context and has resisted this outcome by providing play in the joints. Yet formal neutrality generates the same problems in the equal protection context. I argue that the Court should extend the notion of play in the joints to race doctrine. I conclude by explaining what this approach would require and how it would address the normative concerns underlying formal neutrality.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 80

Keywords: colorblindness, equal protection, formal neutrality, free exercise, establishment clause, legal process

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: April 24, 2012 ; Last revised: May 13, 2012

Suggested Citation

Milligan, Joy, Religion and Race: On Duality and Entrenchment (May 12, 2012). New York University Law Review, Vol. 87, No. 2, May 2012. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2045660

Contact Information

Joy Milligan (Contact Author)
Warren Institute on Law & Social Policy, UC Berkeley School of Law ( email )
2850 Telegraph Ave. Ste. 500
Berkeley, CA 94705
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 723
Downloads: 66
Download Rank: 234,530

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.422 seconds