Building a Taxonomy of Litigation: Clusters of Causes of Action in Federal Complaints
Christina L. Boyd
University of Georgia - School of Public and International Affairs
David A. Hoffman
Temple University - James E. Beasley School of Law; Cultural Cognition Project at Yale Law School; University of Pennsylvania Law School
Temple University - Department of Statisitcs
December 14, 2012
J. Emp. Leg. Stud. ___ (2013, Forthcoming)
Temple University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2012-23
This project empirically explores civil litigation from its inception by examining the content of civil complaints. We utilize spectral cluster analysis on a newly compiled federal district court dataset of causes of action in complaints to illustrate the relationship of legal claims to one another, the broader composition of lawsuits in trial courts, and the breadth of pleading in individual complaints. Our results shed light not only on the networks of legal theories in civil litigation but also on how lawsuits are classified and the strategies that plaintiffs and their attorneys employ when commencing litigation. This approach permits us to lay the foundations for a more precise and useful taxonomy of federal litigation than has been previously available, one that, after the Supreme Court's recent decisions in Bell Atlantic v. Twombly (2007) and Ashcroft v. Iqbal (2009), has also arguably never been more relevant than it is today.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 51
Keywords: complaints, pleadings, Twombly, Iqbal, cluster analysis, causes of action, attorney behavior, network analysis
JEL Classification: K4, K41, C45
Date posted: April 25, 2012 ; Last revised: April 21, 2014
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.438 seconds