Response: Hybrid Revisited
Ohio State University (OSU) - Michael E. Moritz College of Law
April 25, 2012
Ohio State Public Law Working Paper No. 166
This essay responds to Professor Elizabeth Glazer's article entitled Sexual Reorientation by considering the framework that Professor Colker suggested in 1996 in her book entitled Hybrid: Bisexuals, Multiracials and Other Misfits Under American Law. The essay argues that Professor Glazer does not sufficiently consider sexual orientation "resisters" and sexual orientation "tilters" who might feel uncomfortable with the role that biological sex plays in her proposed framework. The essay argues that one should define sexual orientation in relationship to society rather than as a biologically innate facet of one's life.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 14
Keywords: sexual orientation, bisexuality, discrimination
JEL Classification: K39
Date posted: April 25, 2012
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.250 seconds