Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2046743
 


 



Content Discrimination Revisited


Leslie Kendrick


University of Virginia School of Law

April 26, 2012

Virginia Law Review, Vol. 98, No. 2, p. 231, 2012
Virginia Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 2012-29

Abstract:     
A central feature of First Amendment law is the prohibition on content discrimination: the government generally may not regulate expression on the basis of the message it communicates. It has become commonplace to say that the Supreme Court’s content-discrimination jurisprudence is deeply incoherent, if not end-determined. This article argues that, in fact, the case law is consistent in its concern and its approach. Its substantive concern is with subject-matter and viewpoint discrimination. Its approach to these forms of discrimination, for better or worse, strongly echoes the Supreme Court’s approach to invidious purpose in the Equal Protection context. Recognizing this underlying pattern points the way toward a clearer normative evaluation of the content-discrimination principle.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 71

Keywords: First Amendment, free speech, freedom of expression, content discrimination, content neutrality

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: April 26, 2012 ; Last revised: April 28, 2012

Suggested Citation

Kendrick, Leslie, Content Discrimination Revisited (April 26, 2012). Virginia Law Review, Vol. 98, No. 2, p. 231, 2012; Virginia Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 2012-29. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2046743

Contact Information

Leslie Kendrick (Contact Author)
University of Virginia School of Law ( email )
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 793
Downloads: 127
Download Rank: 135,513

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.344 seconds