Abstract

 


 



Construction Defect Claims as Occurrences: Part III


James A. Johnson


Independent

April 9 2012

The Journal of Insurance and Indemnity Law - Vol .5 No.2

Abstract:     
This article must be read in conjunction with Construction Defect Claims as Occurrences: Part I and Construction Defect Claims as Occurrences: Part II posted herein on 5-13-11 and 8-23-11 respectively.

This article explains the nascent majority view that Construction Defects constitute "occurrences" with the Supreme Courts of Indiana, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Kansas, Tennessee, South Dakota, Mississippi, Georgia, Alaska, South Carolina, Texas and Florida.

The supreme courts above have adopted the "subjective test" by applying the definition of "occurrence" to the facts of the case in reaching their conclusions.

Moreover, Colorado, Arkansas, Hawaii and South Carolina have passed statutes that essentially mandate that construction defects are "occurrences."

Number of Pages in PDF File: 2

Keywords: Insurance, Construction Defects, CGL Policy, Occurrences

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: April 27, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Johnson, James A., Construction Defect Claims as Occurrences: Part III (April 9 2012). The Journal of Insurance and Indemnity Law - Vol .5 No.2 . Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2047003

Contact Information

James A. Johnson (Contact Author)
Independent ( email )
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 98
Downloads: 20

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.360 seconds