Abstract

 
 

References (26)



 


 



Kerosene Subsidies in India: When Energy Policy Fails as Social Policy


Narasimha D. Rao


International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis

2012

Energy for Sustainable Development, 16 (2012) 35–43

Abstract:     
Kerosene subsidies intended for Indian households have been known for their poor targeting and high fiscal costs. However, the distributional benefits to the 160 million households that use kerosene are not well understood. In this paper, the kerosene subsidy is formally assessed as an instrument of income redistribution. The subsidy incidence, progressivity and efficacy of the kerosene subsidy are calculated for the state of Maharashtra, under actual and ideal implementation conditions. The analysis shows that kerosene subsidies are regressive and of minimal financial value to poor rural households. This is in part because household quotas are based on cooking needs, but kerosene is used predominantly for lighting. In urban areas, subsidies are progressive, and provide benefits of up to 5 to 10% of household expenditure among poorer households which lack affordable access to LPG and biomass. Overall, only 26% of the total subsidy value directly reaches households. This analysis suggests that subsidies targeted only to kerosene-dependent urban areas would have a higher efficacy than broad-based subsidies.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 9

Keywords: Kerosene, climate change mitigation, India, energy subsidies, distribution

JEL Classification: D1,D3, H1, H3, I3

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: April 27, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Rao, Narasimha D., Kerosene Subsidies in India: When Energy Policy Fails as Social Policy (2012). Energy for Sustainable Development, 16 (2012) 35–43. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2047018

Contact Information

Narasimha D. Rao (Contact Author)
International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis ( email )
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 226
Downloads: 52
Download Rank: 197,047
References:  26

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.406 seconds