Messerschmidt and Convergence in Action: A Reply to Comments on Trawling for Herring
Jennifer E. Laurin
University of Texas School of Law
April 27, 2012
Columbia Law Review, Vol. 100, No. 2, 2012
U of Texas Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 218
This short essay examines the Supreme Court's recent decision Fourth Amendment qualified immunity decision in Messerschmidt v. Millender through the framework of doctrinal borrowing and convergence set forth in my prior piece Trawling for Herring, and responds to incisive responses to that prior essay from Professors John Greabe, Colin Starger, Nelson Tebbe, and Robert Tsai. In short, Messerschmidt strongly exemplifies a continuing trend of convergence between exclusionary rule and constitutional tort doctrine, and does so in a manner that exhibits some of the most negative pathologies of doctrinal borrowing and convergence that Trawling identified.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 16Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: April 29, 2012
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.454 seconds