Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2048716
 
 

Footnotes (378)



 


 



The Inquisitorial Advantage in Removal Proceedings


Won Kidane


Seattle University School of Law

2012

Akron Law Review, Vol. 45, 2012
Seattle University School of Law Research Paper No. 12-20

Abstract:     
This article takes a radically different and unique approach to improving due process in removal/deportation proceedings. It argues that the existing adversarial system of adjudication, which is incontrovertibly inefficient, expensive and unfair, is a product of cultural imaginary. It demonstrates that if the current adversarial model is measured by contemporary utilitarian standards, it is utterly counterproductive. The article then recommends the adoption of the inquisitorial model of the civilian system by converting the majority of the 951 government lawyers, who now serve as the non-citizens’ adversaries, into administrative law judges. Through a comparative analysis of the common law and civil law systems, the article demonstrates that the civilian or inquisitorial model saves a significant amount of resources while improving accuracy, fairness and general acceptability of the system. It finally argues that there is no principled reason why the inquisitorial model cannot be adopted.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 73

Keywords: Civil law, Common law, adversarial system, inquisitorial system, removal proceedings, immigration adjudication, immigration enforcement, representation in immigration proceedings, deportation proceedings

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: April 30, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Kidane, Won, The Inquisitorial Advantage in Removal Proceedings (2012). Akron Law Review, Vol. 45, 2012; Seattle University School of Law Research Paper No. 12-20. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2048716

Contact Information

Won Kidane (Contact Author)
Seattle University School of Law ( email )
901 12th Avenue
Sullivan Hall
Seattle, WA 98122
United States
206-398-4390 (Phone)
206-398-4036 (Fax)

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 318
Downloads: 48
Footnotes:  378

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.265 seconds