Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2049221
 
 

Footnotes (219)



 


 



Were Timothy Mcveigh and the Unabomber the Only White Terrorists?: Race, Religion, and the Perception of Terrorism


Tung Yin


Lewis & Clark Law School

May 1, 2012

Alabama Civil Rights & Civil Liberties Law Review, Vol. 4, Forthcoming
Lewis & Clark Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2012-9

Abstract:     
This article examines real post-9/11 cases of bombings/attempted bombings and mass shootings, and asks why some of the cases have been deemed acts of terrorism, while others with similar fact patterns have not been. The easy, if cynical, answer is that an act of mass violence is terrorism if it is committed by someone who is Muslim (such as Portland’s alleged Pioneer Square bomber Mohamed Mohamud, or Fort Hood shooter Nidal Hasan), but it is not terrorism if it is committed by a non-Muslim (such as a father-son duo who planted a bomb near a bank in Oregon, or Arizona gunman Jared Loughner).

Yet, the easy answer glosses over seemingly plausible explanations for the disparity in perception. This article considers 'micro-level' views of the cases, such as the nature of criminal charges available to the prosecuting jurisdiction (state versus federal), that do explain the disparate perceptions. However, the micro-level view also misses the forest for the trees: notwithstanding the plausible explanations for why the cases are seen differently, there are real costs imposed on society when terrorism becomes branded with Islam: cognitive biases against Muslims become more potent; investigators risk losing the trail of non-Muslim perpetrators when they fixate reflexively on Muslims; and worst of all, some government officials, aware of the biases and concerned about appearing anti-Muslim, may overcompensate by deliberately ignoring specific 'red flags' about Muslim individuals, with tragic results, as the Fort Hood shootings demonstrate.

The article does not pretend that there is a panacea to solve the problem of perceiving terrorism through the lens of race and religion. There are, however, steps to be taken to address and minimize the problem, including de-biasing techniques and redefining 'terrorism,' at least in layperson’s terms to focus on the intended result, rather than the perceived motivation (as the latter tends to result in equating Islamic beliefs with terroristic motivation).

Number of Pages in PDF File: 50

Keywords: terrorism, Islam, Fort Hood, Nidal Hasan, Jared Loughner, Mohamed Mohamud, cognitive biases

JEL Classification: K14, K41

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: May 1, 2012 ; Last revised: May 8, 2012

Suggested Citation

Yin, Tung, Were Timothy Mcveigh and the Unabomber the Only White Terrorists?: Race, Religion, and the Perception of Terrorism (May 1, 2012). Alabama Civil Rights & Civil Liberties Law Review, Vol. 4, Forthcoming; Lewis & Clark Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2012-9. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2049221

Contact Information

Tung Yin (Contact Author)
Lewis & Clark Law School ( email )
10015 S.W. Terwilliger Blvd.
Portland, OR 97219
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,279
Downloads: 316
Download Rank: 55,419
Footnotes:  219

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.437 seconds