Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (142)



 


 



O.P.P.: How 'Occupy's' Race-Based Privilege May Improve Fourth Amendment Jurisprudence for All


Lenese C. Herbert


Albany Law School

2012

Seattle University Law Review, Vol. 35, 2012

Abstract:     
This Article submits that Occupy’s race problem could, ironically, prove to be a solution if protesters grow more serious about exposing the injury of political subordination and systems of privilege that adhere to the criminal justice system. Privilege is a “systemic conferral of benefit and advantage [as a result of] affiliation, conscious or not and chosen or not, to the dominant side of a power system.” Accordingly, now that police mistreatment affects them personally, Occupy may finally help kill a fictitious Fourth Amendment jurisprudence that ignores oppression through improper policing based on racial stigma. Occupy may also help usher in an era in which courts are free(er) to produce a more legitimate jurisprudence regarding police conduct that inspires greater confidence in reality-based adjudications of modern (albeit longstanding) police misconduct, irrespective of race, as the current “[s]ystems of privilege maintain hierarchies of inequality, adversely impacting the possibility of full societal participation.”

Number of Pages in PDF File: 28

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: May 1, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Herbert, Lenese C., O.P.P.: How 'Occupy's' Race-Based Privilege May Improve Fourth Amendment Jurisprudence for All (2012). Seattle University Law Review, Vol. 35, 2012. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2049468

Contact Information

Lenese C. Herbert (Contact Author)
Albany Law School ( email )
80 New Scotland Avenue
Albany, NY 12208
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 230
Downloads: 21
Footnotes:  142

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.391 seconds