Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (68)



 


 



Condemning the Decisions of the Past: Eminent Domain and Democratic Accountability


Christopher Serkin


Brooklyn Law School

October 2012

38 Fordham Urb. L. J. 1173 (2011)
Brooklyn Law School, Legal Studies Paper No. 300

Abstract:     
This brief Essay, part of a Fordham Urban Law Journal Symposium on eminent domain in New York, argues that there is a seldom-recognized purpose to eminent domain: preserving the ability of elected representatives to respond to the will of the people. The essay proposes that eminent domain allows government to depart from the policy choices of administrations which came before and is therefore a tool for preserving "democratic legitimacy." It explores this theory by examining examples such as breaking up the adult use zones in Times Square and reclaiming New York's waterfront.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 21

Keywords: Eminent Domain, Entrenchment, Land Use Property

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: May 4, 2012 ; Last revised: November 5, 2012

Suggested Citation

Serkin, Christopher, Condemning the Decisions of the Past: Eminent Domain and Democratic Accountability (October 2012). 38 Fordham Urb. L. J. 1173 (2011); Brooklyn Law School, Legal Studies Paper No. 300. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2050430

Contact Information

Christopher Serkin (Contact Author)
Brooklyn Law School ( email )
250 Joralemon Street
Brooklyn, NY 11201
United States
(718) 780-7999 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 124
Downloads: 8
Footnotes:  68

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.375 seconds