Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2050590
 
 

Footnotes (350)



 


 



Down-Sizing the Little Guy Myth in Legal Definitions


Mirit Eyal-Cohen


University of Alabama - School of Law

May 3, 2012

Iowa Law Review, Vol. 98, p. 1041, 2013
U. of Pittsburgh Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2012-12

Abstract:     
What is “small” in the eyes of the law? In fact, there is not one standard definition. Current lax legal definitions of firm’s size are inconsistent and overinclusive. They result in data distortion that reinforces favoritism toward small entities as studies on the contribution of small business to the economy are greatly dependent on those studies’ delineation of the term “small.” Therefore, I argue that the current focus on size in legal definitions is a waste of time and money. In this time of huge deficits and rise in economic inequality, a lot of money is being spent based on the entrenched belief that small firms are the essence of our economy, which is not necessarily true.

This paper lays out the policy considerations that underlie the favorable regulatory treatment granted to small firms throughout the law. It provides a comprehensive survey of legal definitions of small entities and concludes that the historical emphasis on magnitude and the creation of legal demarcations concentrated on “smallness” are erroneous. The recent integration of federal commerce and trade agencies is the first step toward this proposed shift from size-centered to goal-driven approach.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 60

Keywords: small business, size, entrepreneurship, legal definition, public policy, health reform, Small Business Administration, economic inequity, tax, regulation

JEL Classification: K34, K20, H25, H81

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: June 8, 2012 ; Last revised: April 7, 2013

Suggested Citation

Eyal-Cohen, Mirit, Down-Sizing the Little Guy Myth in Legal Definitions (May 3, 2012). Iowa Law Review, Vol. 98, p. 1041, 2013; U. of Pittsburgh Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2012-12. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2050590

Contact Information

Mirit Eyal-Cohen (Contact Author)
University of Alabama - School of Law ( email )
P.O. Box 870382
Tuscaloosa, AL 35487
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 492
Downloads: 89
Download Rank: 174,426
Footnotes:  350
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.234 seconds