Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2052250
 
 

Footnotes (219)



 


 



Aggregation and Constitutional Rights


Brandon L. Garrett


University of Virginia School of Law

May 6, 2012

Notre Dame Law Review, Forthcoming
Virginia Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 2012-31

Abstract:     
Constitutional rights can impact large groups, yet most plaintiffs in civil rights cases bring individual claims. Critics of the Supreme Court’s decisions regarding class actions, such as the decision last Term in Dukes v. Wal-Mart, have argued that the Court is generally limiting the ability of plaintiffs to bring class actions through procedural limitations, such as the Wal-Mart Court’s heightening of the commonality requirement. I trace the problem deeper into the substance of constitutional doctrine. The Court has defined certain constitutional rights to require highly individualized inquiries. For example, Fourth Amendment excessive force claims, the bread and butter of constitutional tort litigation, often require an individual analysis of the reasonableness of the search. As a result, courts may deny class certification citing to a lack of common issues. Other constitutional rights - ranging from due process rights, criminal procedure rights, equal protection claims, and takings claims - similarly resist aggregate treatment. The Wal-Mart ruling - although procedural - will have a disproportionate impact on particular substantive areas of the law, even within civil rights litigation. I suggest that this confluence of procedural rulings and change in constitutional doctrine was not anticipated and nor is it desirable. I explore changes to sub-constitutional remedial doctrine and statutes that could rekindle aggregate constitutional litigation. Aggregation would benefit more than just the plaintiffs who bring these cases. If constitutional litigation becomes a purely solitary affair, sporadic cases may have an outsized impact, but in an ad hoc way that provides poor notice to government officials. Aggregation can improve clarity, legitimacy, participation, and representation. Bigger lawsuits may sometimes be better - particularly when developing constitutional values.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 48

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: May 7, 2012 ; Last revised: May 9, 2012

Suggested Citation

Garrett, Brandon L., Aggregation and Constitutional Rights (May 6, 2012). Notre Dame Law Review, Forthcoming; Virginia Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 2012-31. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2052250

Contact Information

Brandon L. Garrett (Contact Author)
University of Virginia School of Law ( email )
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 482
Downloads: 109
Download Rank: 147,535
Footnotes:  219

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.219 seconds