Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2052479
 
 

Footnotes (319)



 


 



Adaptable Due Process


Jason Parkin


Pace University School of Law

May 7, 2012

University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 160, pp. 1309-1377, 2012

Abstract:     
The requirements of procedural due process must adapt to our constantly changing world. Over thirty years have passed since the Supreme Court in Goldberg v. Kelly and Mathews v. Eldridge adopted what appears to be a dynamic, fact-intensive approach to determining the procedures required by the Due Process Clause. Federal, state, and local government agencies responded by establishing new procedural safeguards, many of which are virtually identical to those in use today. Yet, for public benefits programs such as welfare, the intervening decades have brought striking changes. The 1996 federal welfare law created new and powerful incentives to trim the rolls. Work requirements increased the proportion of recipients holding jobs, forcing many to choose between forgoing their due process rights and jeopardizing their employment by missing work to attend a hearing. Technological advances enabled welfare agencies to cut off benefits based on automated eligibility determinations that are difficult for recipients to challenge. Cuts in funding for legal services made the prospect of legal representation at fair hearings remote.

These new facts and circumstances undermine the effectiveness of existing procedures and may require reweighing the Mathews factors to determine what process is due to welfare recipients. Such changes are not unique to welfare; the facts and circumstances relevant to many of the procedural safeguards established since the due process revolution will evolve in the years to come, if they have not already. Although the Supreme Court has not addressed whether or how existing procedures should be adapted to such changes, adapting the demands of due process to new facts and circumstances is faithful to constitutional doctrine and necessary to ensure that existing procedures continue to provide due process of law. It also provides an opportunity to reinvigorate a conversation about procedural justice that went silent many years ago.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 69

Keywords: due process, welfare, fair hearing

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: May 7, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Parkin, Jason, Adaptable Due Process (May 7, 2012). University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 160, pp. 1309-1377, 2012. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2052479

Contact Information

Jason Parkin (Contact Author)
Pace University School of Law ( email )
78 North Broadway
White Plains, NY 10603
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,516
Downloads: 92
Download Rank: 165,512
Footnotes:  319

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.469 seconds