Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2054791
 


 



Treating Blacks as If They Were White: Problems of Definition and Proof in Section 1982 Cases


Daniel Givelber


Northeastern University - School of Law

Stephen Subrin


Northeastern University - School of Law

Judith Olans Brown


Northeastern University - School of Law

1975

University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 124, No. 1, pp. 1-44, November 1975
Northeastern University School of Law Research Paper

Abstract:     
Immediately after the Civil War, the United States Congress enacted, over presidential veto, a statute popularly known as the 1866 Civil Rights Act. In 1870 that statute was reenacted, and a major part is presently codified as sections 1981 and 1982 of title 42 of the United States Code. Those sections lay virtually moribund for a hundred years, until they were reviewed in 1968 as a judicial contribution to the mid-twentieth century civil rights movement. Passed in the wake of Union victory, the 1866 Civil Rights Act represented an attempt by the victors to crystallize the metaphysics of emancipation into the perquisites of citizenship and to give “real content to the freedom guaranteed by the Thirteenth Amendment.” The language of section 1982 is deceptively simple: “All citizens of the United States shall have the same right, in every State and Territory, as is enjoyed by white citizens thereof to inherit, purchase, lease, sell, hold, and convey real and personal property.

Since 1968 there has been considerable litigation under this statute, but little appreciation of the ambiguity of the words “same right … as is enjoyed by white citizens.” Decisions tend to discuss the evidence presented in great detail without relating that evidence to a carefully drawn definition of the statutory language and the elements of the prima facie case which that definition should supply. Until we know what the plaintiff must prove, however, evidentiary analysis lacks direction, and until we know what the statutory language means, there will be no consistent approach to what the plaintiff must prove.

In this Article we shall attempt to define the words “same right … as is enjoyed by white citizens,” to set forth the elements of the prima facie case derived therefrom, and to consider what evidence, inferences, and presumptions would permit a plaintiff to establish those elements. Our inquiry is pertinent not only to section 1982 cases: Section 1981 contains parallel language with respect to contract actions, and Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (as well as several state and local statutes) is directed to similar ends. Therefore, while our definition of the “same right” language is most relevant to sections 1982 and 1981, our discussion of evidentiary considerations is also applicable to civil rights litigation in general.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 45

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: May 8, 2012 ; Last revised: May 27, 2012

Suggested Citation

Givelber, Daniel and Subrin, Stephen and Brown, Judith Olans, Treating Blacks as If They Were White: Problems of Definition and Proof in Section 1982 Cases (1975). University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 124, No. 1, pp. 1-44, November 1975; Northeastern University School of Law Research Paper . Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2054791

Contact Information

Daniel James Givelber (Contact Author)
Northeastern University - School of Law ( email )
400 Huntington Ave.
Boston, MA 02115
United States
617-373-4298 (Phone)
617-373-5056 (Fax)
Stephen Subrin
Northeastern University - School of Law ( email )
400 Huntington Ave.
Boston, MA 02115
United States
Judith Olans Brown
Northeastern University - School of Law ( email )
400 Huntington Ave.
Boston, MA 02115
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 160
Downloads: 7

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.500 seconds