Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2054950
 
 

Footnotes (63)



 


 



The Alphabet Soup of Transborder Intellectual Property Enforcement


Peter K. Yu


Texas A&M University School of Law

May 8, 2012

Drake Law Review Discourse, June 2012, pp. 16-33
Drake University Law School Research Paper No. 12-13

Abstract:     
In the past few years, policymakers, academic commentators, consumer advocates, civil liberties groups, and user communities have expressed grave concerns about the steadily increasing levels of enforcement of intellectual property rights. Many of these concerns relate to the "alphabet soup" of transborder intellectual property enforcement, which consists of the following: SECURE, IMPACT, ACTA, TPP, COICA, PIPA, SOPA, and OPEN.

Published in the inaugural issue of Drake Law Review Discourse, this short essay identifies six different concerns and challenges the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) poses to U.S. consumers, technology developers, and small and midsize firms. It then explores the ongoing negotiation of the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPP) and explains why TPP is likely to be more dangerous than ACTA from a public interest standpoint. The essay concludes by highlighting the challenges recently raised by two new pieces of legislation, the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and the PROTECT IP Act (PIPA).

Number of Pages in PDF File: 19


Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: May 9, 2012 ; Last revised: May 25, 2014

Suggested Citation

Yu, Peter K., The Alphabet Soup of Transborder Intellectual Property Enforcement (May 8, 2012). Drake Law Review Discourse, June 2012, pp. 16-33; Drake University Law School Research Paper No. 12-13. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2054950

Contact Information

Peter K. Yu (Contact Author)
Texas A&M University School of Law ( email )
1515 Commerce St.
Fort Worth, TX 76102
United States
HOME PAGE: http://www.peteryu.com/
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 3,159
Downloads: 495
Download Rank: 34,654
Footnotes:  63
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.343 seconds