Same-Sex Divorce in a DoMA State
Mary Patricia Byrn
William Mitchell College of Law
Hamline University - School of Law
May 11, 2012
Family Court Review, Vol. 50, pp. 214-221, 2012
William Mitchell Legal Studies Research Paper
When marriages fail, access to judicial divorce is crucial, and typically readily available. When faced with petitions for divorce from same-sex couples, however, courts in states with Defense of Marriage Acts (“DoMA states”) are flummoxed; indeed, more often than not, courts in DoMA states refuse access to divorce to same-sex couples. In this essay, we demonstrate that such refusals fail on three levels. First, the denial of access to divorce is bad policy because it traps couples in defunct relationships and leaves families in a sort of legal limbo — married in some jurisdictions, not married in others, and unable to achieve the finality of divorce. Second, it is constitutionally suspect because the denial of access to divorce violates principles of substantive due process and constitutes unconstitutional discrimination under established equal protection jurisprudence. Finally, the denial of same-sex divorce is premised on an unnecessarily narrow view of judicial power. State courts, even in DoMA states, have the power to hear and decide divorce petitions — same-sex or not. In addition, this essay articulates various paths to obtaining same-sex divorce in DoMA states.
Keywords: Defense of Marriage Act, DoMA, divorce, same-sex couples, same-sex marriage, marriage
Date posted: May 12, 2012 ; Last revised: March 12, 2013
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.172 seconds