|
||||
|
||||
Regulatory Techniques in Consumer Protection: A Critique of European Consumer Contract LawOren Bar-GillNew York University School of Law Omri Ben-ShaharUniversity of Chicago Law School May 1, 2012 NYU Law and Economics Research Paper No. 12-12 University of Chicago Institute for Law & Economics Olin Research Paper No. 598 Abstract: This Article classifies the consumer protection techniques that European contract law employs into four categories: Mandatory arrangements; disclosure; regulation of entry to and exit from contracts; and pro-buyer default rules and contract interpretation. It argues that these techniques are far less likely to succeed than advocates, including the European Commission, believe, and that they may bring about unintended consequences and hurt consumers. The techniques and their limits are illustrated through a study of the proposed Common European Sales Law (CESL). The Article argues that the ambitious pursuit of consumer protection goals is also likely to interfere with the other main goals of European contract law: harmonizing the laws of member states, encouraging cross border trade, and improving consumers’ access to markets.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 33 working papers seriesDate posted: May 16, 2012 ; Last revised: June 13, 2012Suggested Citation |
|
|||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo2 in 1.297 seconds