Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2062032
 
 

References (74)



 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (22)



 


 



The Role of Case Complexity in Judicial Decision Making


Laura P. Moyer


Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge - Department of Political Science

July 2012

Law & Policy, Vol. 34, Issue 3, pp. 291-312, 2012

Abstract:     
The literature on ideology and decision making offers conflicting expectations about how judges' ideology should affect their votes in cases that raise many legal issues. Using cases from the U.S. courts of appeals, I examine the strength of ideology as a predictor of sincere voting in single and multi‐issue cases, and test whether the same effect for ideology can be seen for liberal and conservative judges. For all judges, ideology yields a larger effect as the number of issues increases; however, conservative judges are much more likely than liberal judges to cast sincere votes at all levels of complexity.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 22

Accepted Paper Series


Date posted: May 19, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Moyer, Laura P., The Role of Case Complexity in Judicial Decision Making (July 2012). Law & Policy, Vol. 34, Issue 3, pp. 291-312, 2012. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2062032 or http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9930.2012.00362.x

Contact Information

Laura P. Moyer (Contact Author)
Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge - Department of Political Science ( email )
Baton Rouge, LA
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 328
Downloads: 1
References:  74
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  22

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.313 seconds